Alleged Bar Security Negligence Leads to Brutal Assault
This case study examines an incident in a bar where inadequate security measures allegedly led to a brutal assault on a patron. It highlights the expert's insights on the necessity of enhanced security protocols in licensed venues and the legal implications for establishments failing to ensure patron safety.
Updated on
Case Overview
This case study focuses on a severe incident that took place in an urban bar, akin to those found in bustling neighborhoods like Midtown NYC. An adult woman was assaulted around 7:30 PM as she was exiting the restroom located in the basement of the establishment. The assailant, a level 3 sex offender who had recently been released from custody, resided nearby.
The venue, officially leased as a coffee and cocktail lounge, operated primarily as a sports bar and disco club. It employed one security guard whose shift commenced at 8 PM, half an hour after the assault occurred. Notably, there were no surveillance cameras installed outside the restrooms. Allegations have been raised against the bar for its negligence in providing adequate security for its patrons.
Questions to the Criminal Justice expert and their responses
Could you describe your background in law enforcement, specifically with the NYPD?
I held the position of Lieutenant within the NYPD, assigned to Community Affairs where I oversaw the Crime Prevention Unit. My responsibilities included conducting checks of venues licensed to sell alcoholic beverages and ensuring their adherence to occupancy codes. In cases where premises failed to secure their locations adequately, I initiated nuisance abatement proceedings.
What types of enhanced security should have been present in this bar to prevent such an incident?
According to Section 64-e, cabaret establishments are required to install security cameras at entrances and exits. Additionally, it is common practice for Community Boards to mandate that venues serving alcohol employ security guards.
A common-sense standard also applies which necessitates proprietors to implement safety measures for their patrons' protection. Even if the security guard's shift started post-incident, accountability still lies with the proprietor who must submit a report to the state liquor authority.
Have you ever reviewed a similar case? If so, could you provide some details?
Yes, I am currently serving as an expert on a case involving an assault in a bar with a cabaret license where no security was on duty. The venue is facing civil liability due to previous incidents and the proprietors' failure to implement physical security measures alongside cameras.
About the expert
This expert boasts over three decades of experience in criminal justice and law enforcement procedures, including a 20-year tenure at a major city police department comparable to the New York City Police Department. Their roles ranged from serving as a police officer on the civilian complaint review board to an investigative supervisor in the internal affairs bureau, and as a community relations and integrity control officer in the community affairs bureau. Currently, they are an adjunct professor of criminal justice at two universities and a founding partner at a public safety and policing consultancy, leveraging their extensive knowledge gained from advanced degrees in organizational management, public administration, and education.

E-071642
Specialties:
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.
Sign up nowFind an expert witness near you
What State is your case in?
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.